🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. COBRA. SHOP. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average worker. Choosing the right medical coverage for our business – or for our families – seems like demands a PhD in healthcare.

The Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Costly

According to recent research, typical households spends $27,000 each year on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down due to political disagreements regarding subsidies which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way medical professionals receive payment would change. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would need payments from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee making average wages must contribute approximately five point three percent to their healthcare. The company must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you contrast it to what the typical US resident spends. I know multiple clients that are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, those payments also cover pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When including these expenses versus our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

In the US, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It should be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and employer contribution. Similar to many our government's defense, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the system could be managed to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would render management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complicated (and ineffective) process of negotiating with major insurers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complexities of existing plans. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer would be privy to our employees' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in our lives, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It makes it possible employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning effectively. I understand that we're not a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, despite increased taxation required, would still be a superior and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank well below many other countries in healthcare quality in the world, based on major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect amid present circumstances could be that we take serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.