🔗 Share this article

The acclaimed actor is likely the perfect pick for a bold horror film centered on the biblical figure, but not for the causes certain fans may think. Actually, Cage does not even play Jesus in the new film: his character is referred to merely as The Carpenter. The actor is positioned as the Joseph in this story, striving to maintain his religious convictions as The Boy (played by Noah Jupe), his teenage adopted son, starts to exhibit supernatural abilities. The explanation it's challenging to picture another leading star playing this part is that while the role becomes burdened with multiple trials, the actor looks almost emotionally convinced that the murky, grim feature is a valuable project.

The Actor's Current Film Selections

Cage has been spending that time more carefully in recent years. He yet does more movies than most casual fans may ever watch — as an illustration, are you aware that the actor has made three distinct Westerns recently? — but he also includes high-profile A24/Neon gigs for example one recent hit, another notable movie, and Longlegs. The Carpenter’s Son sounds like a similar project, because it’s genre-adjacent, likely to stir debate, and takes a campy-sounding description with gravity.

The Film's Storyline and Handling

Unfortunately, writer-director Lotfy Nathan does not reward viewer engagement. The film starts from a engagingly rootless setting, positioned as inspired by an apocryphal lost gospel concerning the early years of Jesus. The Carpenter, The Mother, and their son relocate from place to place, fearful of doctrinal intolerance or distrust over The Boy’s unusual abilities. “Disaster trails us,” The Carpenter mournfully notes. It goes on as evil influences focus on them in their latest settlement, getting a jump-start on the well-known scriptural test for the son.

Sometimes, the movie resembles an demonic possession-type supernatural thriller, but not one of the main figures are clearly inhabited. Rather, they grow progressively isolated mutually, when these forces affect a nearby girl (the actress, named “The Stranger”) that the son forms a relationship with, and presents each character unsettling premonitions of a grim future. Cage's role in particular fights with his place within the plot, occasionally berating his child he can’t fully understand.

Controversy and Caution

The subject matter is likely to stir disagreement, and the director handles it with much care — excessive, maybe. The idea of a young man facing his future martyrdom and seduced by unknown powers is certainly terrifying, but Nathan could be cautious about seeming gratuitous and eager to signal his intentions, thus he frequently falls back on darkly ominous cinematography. The figures brood incessantly — FKA Twigs, who demonstrated notable talent in the 2024 Crow remake, of all things — cedes her acting to her Mother Mary cloak, occasionally interrupted by a few disturbing frightening scenes.

The Star's Portrayal and Movie's Flaws

Simultaneously, Cage flirts with just the sort of overacting that those who enjoy his campier roles could be expecting. An instance (featured) in promotional material where Cage loses control and yells “My faith has been shattered!” Should such of florid outburst is part of your biblical thriller, maybe a more brazenly silly style would make better use of Cage’s willingness to be extreme if needed. On the other hand, the film more closely resembles the weaker straight-to-DVD films the actor filmed over the last decade — apart from the B-movies but rather the serious stories and supernatural thrillers that often seem intriguing, and often contain some select actor's highlights, but finally come across like, frankly, low-budget DTV material.

Honestly, a number of those, while less ambitious, were more watchable in general. At this point I have to break my own dogma, not spiritual but career-related: Long ago, an admired senior urged me to banish words like “tedious” or “uninteresting” from my analytical lexicon. These words convey little other than a personal and vaguely expressed impatience, avoiding the job of vividly conveying the intellectual and feeling of viewing an individual production. It's challenging to express monotony without sounding boring oneself. It’s no more expressive as terming a movie “interesting.” “Elaborate,” in other words.

However, I admit, I grew weary for a large part of the film. On the positive side, it’s a devotional type of dullness, not for The Carpenter’s Son is preachy, but because it requires a type of patient acceptance to view it. After a while soon after starting, this feature settles into a monotonous pattern of simmering anguish, and never really